Can a Doctor Lose Their License Outside Hospital?

By Konika Gayen Keshervani | June 2026 | 5 Minutes Read

Summary: Under India’s NMC Code of Medical Ethics, a doctor’s professional obligations follow them everywhere — not just inside hospitals. The Pranit More show controversy reveals how one viral moment can trigger State Medical Council action, professional misconduct proceedings, and even license cancellation.

A clip from a Mumbai comedy show went viral across India in June 2026. In it, a MBBS student named Sejal Pawar — associated with KEM Hospital — described how she and her colleagues would compare the sizes of male cadavers during dissection. The audience laughed. Social media did not.
Within days, an FIR had been filed, the United Doctors Front had sent a legal notice to comedian Pranit More and the event organiser, and the doctor had made her Instagram account private after issuing a public apology.
But behind all the outrage, a serious legal question sits unanswered: Can what a doctor says outside a hospital — at a comedy club, on social media, or anywhere in public life — actually cost them their medical license?( Note: Sejal Pawar is not a doctor yet, this post discusses what if a doctor behaves in a similar way.)
The answer, under Indian law, is yes. And the framework that makes this possible is both more rigorous and more nuanced than most people realise.

A medical license is not just a qualification. It is a standard of conduct — 24 hours a day.

The Regulatory Architecture: Who Governs Doctors in India?

To understand professional liability, you first need to understand who holds the authority to act against a doctor.
Until 2020, that authority rested with the Medical Council of India (MCI). The National Medical Commission Act, 2019 dissolved the MCI and replaced it with the National Medical Commission (NMC), which came into full effect in 2020.
Within the NMC structure, the Ethics and Medical Registration Board (EMRB) is the body specifically responsible for regulating professional conduct and promoting medical ethics. It also exercises appellate jurisdiction over decisions made by State Medical Councils.
In practice, the process works like this:

A complaint of professional or ethical misconduct is filed before the relevant State Medical Council
The State Medical Council investigates and can impose disciplinary action, including monetary penalties.
If the doctor is aggrieved by the decision, they can appeal to the EMRB at the NMC.
In parallel, the NMC’s code of ethics sets the substantive standards that determine what counts as misconduct in the first place.

The Code of Ethics: No Off-Duty Exemption

The Code of Medical Ethics Regulations, 2002 — still operative under the NMC framework alongside the newer Professional Conduct Regulations, 2023 — sets out the standards expected of every registered medical practitioner in India.
Chapter 7 of the 2002 Regulations defines professional misconduct as any act of commission or omission on the part of a physician that renders them liable for disciplinary action. Crucially, the Code does not restrict its application to acts performed inside a hospital, clinic, or other clinical setting.
The Code requires every physician to uphold the dignity and honour of the medical profession. This is a professional identity obligation — it attaches to the doctor as a person, not merely to their clinical role.

The Code requires every physician to uphold the dignity and honour of the medical profession. There is no geographical or temporal boundary written into this obligation.

This means that a doctor who publicly ridicules patients, demeans the deceased they work with, or makes statements that bring the profession into disrepute can potentially face disciplinary proceedings — even if the statement was made at a social event, posted on personal social media, or uttered at a comedy show.

The Criminal Law Connection: When an FIR Changes Everything

The professional liability question becomes significantly more serious if a criminal case is involved.
Chapter 7 of the NMC Ethics Regulations explicitly lists conviction by a court of law for offences involving moral turpitude as a ground for disciplinary action. Moral turpitude, in Indian legal usage, refers to conduct that is inherently base, vile, or depraved — conduct that shocks the conscience of the community.
If Dr. Sejal Pawar’s FIR were to result in a criminal conviction — under BNS Section 301 (indignity to human remains), or under other provisions — that conviction itself would become a trigger for the Maharashtra Medical Council to initiate disciplinary proceedings.
The sequence would be:

Criminal court convicts the doctor for an offence involving moral turpitude.
Conviction is communicated to or noticed by the Maharashtra Medical Council.
MMC initiates disciplinary inquiry.
Depending on severity, the MMC can impose a monetary penalty, suspend the registration, or cancel the medical license entirely.
The doctor can appeal to the NMC’s EMRB.

It is important to note that the criminal case and the professional disciplinary proceeding are independent of each other. A doctor can face action from the Medical Council even before any criminal court delivers a verdict — if the conduct itself is found to amount to professional misconduct under the Ethics Code.

scroll down to read more

Ethics, Integrity & Aptitude Guide for UPSC Civil Services Exam (…

₹569

Buy on Amazon

What About Free Speech? Can a Doctor Not Express an Opinion?

This is a fair question, and it points to a real tension in the law.
Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution guarantees every citizen the right to freedom of speech and expression. Doctors, like all citizens, hold this right.
However, Article 19(2) permits the State to impose reasonable restrictions on this right in the interests of public order, decency, and morality. Professional ethics codes — which are grounded in statute — can constitute such reasonable restrictions when they apply to conduct that affects public trust in a regulated profession.
Courts in India have consistently held that members of regulated professions — lawyers, doctors, chartered accountants — accept a higher standard of conduct as a condition of their registration. The privilege of practising medicine comes with obligations that ordinary citizens do not bear.

The privilege of practising medicine comes with obligations that ordinary citizens do not bear. Accepting a license means accepting the standard of conduct that comes with it.

This does not mean that doctors cannot have opinions, make jokes, or participate in public life. It means that conduct which falls below the standard expected of the profession — especially when it concerns the patients, deceased persons, or communities a doctor works with — is not shielded from professional scrutiny simply because it occurred outside the hospital walls.

The Broader Picture: Why This Case Matters

The Pranit More comedy show controversy is not simply about one doctor and one clip. It raises questions that are increasingly relevant in an age of viral content, personal social media accounts, and the blurring of professional and personal public identities.
Three questions deserve particular attention

1. Cadavers and the Dignity of the Dead

People who donate their bodies to medical science do so with the expectation that their remains will be used with dignity for education and research. The medical community’s relationship with cadavers is governed by both institutional protocols and an implicit ethical contract with donors and their families.
When a doctor publicly speaks about cadavers in a manner that is perceived as disrespectful or degrading, it does not just embarrass the profession — it may actively deter body donation, which has public health consequences.

2. Social Media and Professional Conduct

This case also signals how social media appearances — including casual audience participation at public events — can have serious professional consequences. A statement made to a comedy club audience of a few hundred people can reach millions within hours.
Doctors, and all regulated professionals, should be aware that the NMC’s professional conduct framework applies to their public conduct generally — not just to formal professional communications.

3. The Accountability Gap in Medical Regulation

Critics of India’s medical regulatory framework have pointed out that the system — where doctors are effectively investigated, prosecuted, and judged by fellow doctors through State Medical Councils — creates a structural conflict of interest. The UK separated these functions in 2012 through the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service.
Whether or not the MMC acts in this case, the controversy highlights the need for clearer, more accessible, and more transparent mechanisms for holding medical professionals accountable for conduct that goes beyond clinical negligence.

What the Law Says: A Summary

NMC Code of Medical Ethics 2002 (Chapter 7): Requires doctors to uphold the dignity and honour of the profession at all times. Applies beyond clinical settings.
NMC Act 2019: Establishes State Medical Councils as the first forum for professional misconduct complaints, with EMRB as appellate authority.
Conviction for moral turpitude: Explicitly grounds for disciplinary action under the Ethics Regulations, including potential license suspension or cancellation.
BNS Section 301: Targets indignity to human remains, but applies geographically only to places of worship and sepulture — making direct application to a comedy club legally uncertain.
Article 19(1)(a) & 19(2): Free speech rights exist for doctors, but reasonable restrictions apply for conduct affecting professional standards and public trust.

The viral clip from Pranit More’s comedy show has already done what viral clips do — generated heat, prompted apologies, and faded from the trending section. But the legal questions it raises are permanent.
Indian law — through the NMC’s ethics framework, the State Medical Council system, and the constitutional interpretation of professional obligations — is clear: a doctor’s professional duties do not end at the hospital gate. The standard of conduct that comes with a medical license follows a practitioner into every public space they occupy, every platform they appear on, and every audience they address.
Whether Dr. Sejal Pawar ultimately faces formal action or not, this case serves as a reminder that in India’s regulatory framework, a medical degree is not just a certificate of competence. It is an ongoing commitment to a standard of dignity — including towards those who can no longer speak for themselves.

Disclaimer: This article is for legal awareness and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. Readers are encouraged to consult a qualified legal professional for guidance on specific matters.